Are universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse mode better than old 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives? One-year evaluation of bonding properties to dentin.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the bonding properties of dentin of three 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives (2-ERAs) to those of three universal adhesives (UAs) applied with an etch-and-rinse strategy (ER), immediately and after 1 year of water storage. METHODS: Sixty caries-free molars were divided into 6 groups according to the adhesive systems used (n = 10). The 2-ERA systems included were: 1) Adper Single Bond 2 (SB), 2) Tetric N-Bond (TB), and 3) Ambar (AM); and the UAs systems were: 4) Single Bond Universal (SBU) 5) Tetric N-Bond Universal (TBU), and 6) Ambar Universal (AMU). The occlusal third of each tooth was removed and the adhesives were applied. After the composite build-up, specimens were sectioned and tested for microtensile bond strength (µTBS) and nanoleakage (NL) immediately and after 1 year of water storage. In situ degree of conversion (DC) was only evaluated in the immediate time. For water sorption (WS), solubility (SO), and mass change (MC) tests, 48 disk-shaped specimens were prepared (n = 8) and assessed according to ISO 4049:2009. RESULTS: UAs showed higher µTBS and lower NL values than 2-ERAs did after 1 year of water storage (p = 0.001). Regarding DC, 2-ERAs showed higher DC values than UAs (p = 0.001). Regarding WS, 2-ERAs showed higher WS values than those of UAs (p = 0.00001), except for AM and AMU. Lower WS was observed for AM than for other 2-ERAs (p = 0.00001). CONCLUSION: The use of UAs applied with the ER strategy seems to be a more effective technique for maintaining adhesion to dentin substrate than 2-ERAS. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study may support clinicians in selecting the most adequate adhesive system to be used in ER strategy in dentin, demonstrating that UAs were more effective, considering the longevity of the resin restorations.

Adaptación marginal de coronas de disilicato de litio obtenidas mediante técnicas de escaneo (CAD/CAM): análisis in vitro con microscopía confocal / Marginal adaptation of lithium disilicate crowns obtained by scanning techniques (CAD/CAM): in vitro confocal microscopy analysis

Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la adaptación marginal de coronas de disilicato de litio obtenidas mediante técnicas de escaneo (CAD/CAM), antes y des- pués de la cristalización, a través de análisis in vitro con microscopía confocal (MC). Métodos. Fueron confeccionadas 16 réplicas en poliuretano a partir de la pieza 1.4, de modelo typodont, tallada para corona total. Las réplicas fueron divididas en dos gru- pos, de acuerdo a la técnica de escaneo: Técnica Indirecta (Grupo IND, n=08), donde modelos de yeso fueron escaneados con escáner de laboratorio (inEos X5, Sirona Den- tal Systems) y Técnica Directa (Grupo DIR, n=08), donde modelos typodont fueron escaneados con escáner intraoral (CEREC BlueCam, Sirona Dental Systems). A seguir, se fresaron (inLab MC XL, Sirona Dental Systems) coronas en disilicato de litio (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) y se adaptaron a las réplicas. Se evaluó la adaptación marginal con análisis de MC en dos momentos, antes y después de la cristalización del disilicato de litio. Los datos fueron analizados con la prueba de Mann-Whitney, t de Student y Wilcoxon (α= 0,05). Resultados. Hubo una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la adaptación marginal horizontal entre los grupos IND y DIR después de la cristalización (p=0,05). En el grupo IND, la comparación de la adaptación mar- ginal vertical antes y después de la cristalización mostró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p=0,038). Conclusiones. Las coronas de disilicato de litio obtenidas me- diante escaneo directo (CAD/CAM) presentaron menor desajuste marginal vertical. La etapa de cristalización afectó la adaptación marginal de las coronas.

Objective. This study aimed to evaluate lithium disilicate marginal adaption on crowns by scanning techniques (CAD/CAM), before and after crystallization, through confocal microscopy (CM) in vitro analysis. Methods. Sixteen polyurethane replicas were per- formed from tooth 1.4, of a typodont model, prepared for a full crown. The replicas were divided into two groups, according to the scanning technique: Indirect Technique (Group IND, n=08), where dental stone models were scanned with a laboratory scanner (inEos X5, Sirona Dental Systems) and Direct Technique (Group DIR, n=08), where typodont models were scanned with an intraoral scanner (CEREC BlueCam, Sirona Dental Systems). Then, the lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were milled (inLab MC XL, Sirona Dental Systems) and adapted to the replicas. Margin- al adaptation was evaluated with CM analysis before and after lithium disilicate crystalli- zation. Data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney, t test, and Wilconxon test (α=0.05). Results. There was a statistically significant difference in horizontal marginal adaptation between IND and DIR groups after crystallization (p=0.05). In IND group, the compar- ison of vertical marginal adaptation before and after crystallization showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.038). Conclusions. Lithium disilicate crowns obtained by direct scanning technique (CAD/CAD) showed less vertical marginal maladjustment. The crystallization stage affected the crown's marginal adaptation.